Remote meeting fatigue is real. After years of Zoom calls, Teams meetings, and Google Meet sessions, we've all experienced that glazed-over feeling when cameras turn off one by one and participants go silent. The problem isn't remote work itself—it's that most virtual meetings lack the natural engagement cues and interactive elements that happen automatically in face-to-face settings.
The good news? Engagement in remote meetings isn't accidental. It's engineered. With the right combination of tools and intentional facilitation, you can transform passive listeners into active participants. The key is using interactive elements strategically: breaking up monologues with quick polls, adding randomness to prevent the same people from dominating, and creating visual focal points that keep attention on the screen.
This article covers five tools that actually work for making remote meetings more engaging, from random name pickers to collaborative whiteboards to gamified quizzes. We'll explain what each tool does best, when to use it, and how to combine multiple tools for maximum impact. NameWheels is one of these tools, but it's certainly not the only solution—effective meeting engagement requires a toolkit, not a single magic bullet.
Whether you're running daily standups, facilitating workshops, or leading all-hands meetings, you'll find practical strategies you can implement in your next session. Let's dive into the tools that can help you reclaim attention and make remote meetings something people actually look forward to attending.
Tool 1: NameWheels (Random Picker)
Random selection tools solve one of the most persistent problems in remote meetings: the same vocal participants dominating while others stay silent. When you manually call on people, it's easy to fall into patterns—always picking the person whose hand is raised first, or unconsciously selecting the same confident speakers. This creates an environment where quieter team members disengage because they know they won't be called on.
NameWheels brings fairness and transparency to participant selection. Add your team member names to the wheel, screen share it during your meeting, and let everyone watch the spin together. The visual element creates a moment of anticipation, and the randomness ensures everyone has an equal chance of being selected. This works especially well for determining presentation order during standups, picking who shares first during retrospectives, or selecting someone to answer discussion questions.
Beyond just picking presenters, you can use NameWheels for icebreaker questions at the start of meetings. Load the icebreaker wheel with conversation-starting prompts, spin to select a question, then go around the room having everyone answer. The randomness of the question itself makes it feel fresh rather than scripted, and people are more willing to engage with prompts that feel spontaneous rather than planned.
To use NameWheels in Zoom or any video conferencing platform, simply open the wheel in a browser tab and screen share that window. Make sure to enable audio sharing so participants can hear the satisfying tick sound as the wheel spins. The key to making this work is consistency—use the spinner regularly so it becomes a predictable part of your meeting culture rather than a gimmick that appears once and disappears.
Pro tip: For recurring meetings with the same participants, create a team-specific wheel with everyone's names and bookmark it. The wheel auto-saves in your browser, so your roster will be ready to go whenever you need it. For standup meetings, you can even use the wheel to determine the order speakers present, rotating through everyone fairly without anyone feeling singled out or overlooked.
Tool 2: Miro or Mural (Virtual Whiteboard)
Virtual whiteboard tools like Miro and Mural transform passive listening into active creation. Unlike screen sharing a static presentation, these collaborative canvases let everyone contribute simultaneously—adding sticky notes, drawing connections, voting on ideas, or organizing concepts into frameworks. This is invaluable for brainstorming sessions, design workshops, retrospectives, or any meeting where you need to capture and organize collective thinking.
The power of virtual whiteboards lies in their ability to make thinking visible and participatory. Instead of one person capturing notes while others watch, everyone can write their ideas on digital sticky notes at the same time. This parallel contribution is faster than going around the room verbally and gives introverts equal voice with extroverts. You can group similar ideas together, vote on priorities using dot voting, or use pre-built templates for structured activities like SWOT analysis or user story mapping.
Miro and Mural work particularly well when paired with NameWheels for breakout planning. Use the random picker to assign people to small groups, then give each group a section of the whiteboard to collaborate on a specific problem or question. This combination ensures balanced group composition while providing a structured canvas for collaborative output. After breakout sessions, groups can present their whiteboard section to the larger meeting, creating a visual record of the discussion that persists after the call ends.
When to use virtual whiteboards: Design thinking sessions, agile retrospectives, strategic planning meetings, workshops where you're building frameworks or models together, and any time you need to organize complex information collaboratively. They're less useful for status updates, one-way presentations, or meetings where you're primarily sharing information rather than generating it. The setup overhead means you need at least 20-30 minutes of collaborative work to justify the tool.
Both Miro and Mural offer free tiers with limited boards, which is usually sufficient for small teams or occasional use. The learning curve is moderate—plan to spend 15 minutes familiarizing yourself with the interface before facilitating a meeting with it, and consider creating a template board ahead of time so participants aren't starting from a blank canvas.
Tool 3: Mentimeter or Slido (Live Polls)
Live polling tools give everyone a voice, even in large meetings where verbal participation isn't practical. Instead of asking "Does everyone agree?" and getting awkward silence or a few verbal responses, you can launch a poll and see real-time results as people vote from their phones or computers. This works for everything from simple yes/no questions to multiple choice opinions to sliding scale sentiment checks.
Mentimeter and Slido both excel at creating interactive moments during otherwise one-way presentations. You might use a word cloud poll to ask "What's the biggest challenge you're facing right now?" and watch responses populate a visual cloud where frequently mentioned words appear larger. This gives instant insight into what's on people's minds and creates a break from passive listening. Or use multiple choice polls to gauge understanding after explaining a concept, helping you calibrate whether to move forward or spend more time on clarification.
The anonymous Q&A feature in both tools is particularly valuable for larger meetings or sessions with hierarchy dynamics. Participants can submit questions throughout the presentation without putting themselves on the spot, and other attendees can upvote questions they also want answered. This surfaces the most pressing concerns and ensures quieter team members can participate without the pressure of speaking up in front of senior leadership or large groups.
When to use live polls: All-hands meetings where you need to gauge sentiment or understanding across many people, training sessions where you want to check knowledge retention, presentations where you want to insert interactive breaks every 10-15 minutes, and any meeting where you suspect people might have questions they're hesitant to ask aloud. Polls work less well for small team meetings where it's easier to just talk, or highly interactive sessions where everyone is already actively participating.
Both tools offer free versions with some limitations on audience size and features. Slido integrates particularly well with Zoom and Microsoft Teams, allowing polls to appear directly in the meeting window rather than requiring a separate browser tab. Mentimeter has more visually engaging presentation modes and supports more creative question types like image choices and ranking exercises.
Tool 4: Zoom Reactions & Polls (Built-in)
Before investing in third-party tools, explore what your video conferencing platform already offers. Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet all have built-in engagement features that most hosts dramatically underutilize. These native tools have the advantage of requiring no additional accounts, no tab-switching, and minimal learning curve for participants who are already familiar with the platform.
Zoom reactions—the thumbs up, clapping hands, and heart icons that briefly appear over your video—are perfect for quick pulse checks. Ask "Thumbs up if you're clear on next steps, thumbs down if you need clarification" and you'll get instant visual feedback from everyone without interrupting the flow of conversation. This is far more effective than asking "Any questions?" which usually generates silence even when people are confused.
Zoom's built-in polling feature lets you create multiple choice or true/false questions that appear as pop-ups during the meeting. Unlike external polling tools, results appear directly in the meeting window, and you can download response data afterward. The limitation is that polls must be created before the meeting starts, so they work best for planned check-ins rather than spontaneous questions. Use them for knowledge checks after training segments, for gathering input on decisions, or for anonymous voting on proposals.
Don't overlook breakout rooms as an engagement tool. The simple act of splitting a large meeting into smaller groups dramatically increases participation. People who never speak in a 20-person meeting will actively contribute in groups of 3-4. Use breakout rooms for discussing a question, working through a scenario, or having small group introductions before regrouping to share insights with the full meeting. The key is giving clear instructions and specific time limits—ambiguity and open-ended timing kill the effectiveness of breakout sessions.
The beauty of using Zoom's native features is that they work immediately with no setup beyond clicking a button. Reactions require zero preparation, polls need about five minutes of pre-meeting setup, and breakout rooms can be created either in advance or spontaneously during the call. Start with these before adding external tools to your tech stack.
Tool 5: Kahoot or Quizizz (Gamification)
When training sessions or team meetings feel like lectures, gamification platforms like Kahoot and Quizizz inject energy through friendly competition. These quiz-based tools transform learning and knowledge-sharing into game-show experiences, with points, leaderboards, and time pressure that create genuine excitement even in professional contexts.
Kahoot works by displaying questions on the shared screen while participants answer from their phones or computers, earning points based on speed and accuracy. The competitive element—seeing your name climb the leaderboard—taps into motivation that pure information sharing can't match. Use it for product training where you want to reinforce key features, onboarding sessions where you're testing knowledge retention, or team meetings where you're reviewing policies or processes.
Quizizz offers a similar experience but with the option for self-paced quizzes where participants work through questions at their own speed rather than advancing together. This is valuable for asynchronous learning or when you want to remove the time pressure element. Both platforms support question types beyond multiple choice, including true/false, ordering, and short answer questions.
The key to using gamification tools effectively is matching the context to the format. Kahoot's live, fast-paced quiz style works well for energizing meetings and creating moments of friendly competition. It's less appropriate for serious strategic discussions or meetings where you're addressing difficult topics. Think of it as a tool for learning reinforcement, energy injection, and team bonding rather than primary instruction or decision-making.
Both platforms offer free tiers suitable for small to medium teams, with limitations on question types and participant numbers in the free versions. Creating a quiz takes 10-20 minutes depending on complexity, so plan ahead rather than trying to build one on the fly. The payoff is meetings where people are leaning forward, actively engaged, and often surprised by how much they're enjoying what could otherwise be dry material.
Combining Tools for Maximum Engagement
Individual tools are useful, but the real magic happens when you orchestrate multiple engagement strategies within a single meeting. A well-designed interactive session might start with a NameWheels icebreaker, transition to collaborative work in Miro, gather feedback through a Mentimeter poll, and end with a Kahoot quiz—all in the span of 60 minutes. The key is intentional sequencing that matches tools to meeting phases.
Here's a sample 45-minute team retrospective meeting agenda that combines tools strategically:
0-5 minutes: Icebreaker with NameWheels. Start by screen sharing the icebreaker wheel and spinning to select a warm-up question like "What's one win you had this week, work or personal?" Go around the virtual room having everyone answer briefly. This transitions people from work mode into meeting mode and creates psychological safety before diving into potentially difficult retrospective topics.
5-20 minutes: Collaborative retrospective in Miro. Share a pre-built Miro board with three columns: "What went well," "What could improve," and "Action items." Give everyone five minutes to add anonymous sticky notes to the first two columns, working simultaneously. Then spend ten minutes grouping similar themes, discussing patterns, and having honest conversation about what needs to change.
20-35 minutes: Breakout discussions. Use NameWheels to randomly assign people to small breakout groups of 3-4, giving each group one of the "could improve" themes to discuss. Use Zoom's native breakout rooms feature for 10 minutes of small group discussion, with each group tasked with generating at least two concrete action items in their Miro board section.
35-43 minutes: Report back and decision-making. Reconvene and have each breakout group spend two minutes presenting their section of the Miro board. For any action items that require team buy-in, use Zoom's built-in polling or a quick Mentimeter vote to gauge support and prioritize next steps.
43-45 minutes: Quick pulse check. End with a simple Zoom reaction request: "Thumbs up if you feel good about our action items, hand raise if you have concerns we need to address before next meeting." This gives a final opportunity to surface any unspoken hesitations before people disconnect.
This combination works because each tool serves a distinct purpose: NameWheels creates fair randomness, Miro enables collaborative output, breakout rooms increase participation through small group dynamics, and polls/reactions provide quick feedback mechanisms. The meeting has varied interaction modes—individual reflection, simultaneous contribution, small group discussion, and full group decision-making—which maintains engagement far better than a single mode sustained for 45 minutes.
The mistake many facilitators make is using every tool in every meeting. Choose tools based on your meeting objectives, not because you want to try something new. A quick standup doesn't need a Miro board. A one-way announcement doesn't need breakout rooms. Match the tool to the purpose, and don't be afraid to use the same effective combination repeatedly—predictable structure with varied content is more engaging than constantly changing formats.
No Single Tool Fixes Boring Meetings
If there's one takeaway from this overview of engagement tools, it's that technology alone doesn't create engagement—intentional facilitation does. NameWheels, Miro, Mentimeter, Zoom features, and Kahoot are all useful instruments, but they're only as effective as the person orchestrating them. A poorly facilitated meeting with five tools is still boring. A well-designed meeting with just Zoom reactions can be genuinely engaging.
The tools covered here solve different engagement problems. Use random pickers like NameWheels when you need fairness in selection or want to inject spontaneity. Use virtual whiteboards when you need collaborative creation and visual organization. Use live polls when you need to quickly gauge understanding or gather input from large groups. Use gamification when you want to energize learning or create friendly competition. Use your platform's built-in features as your foundation before adding external tools.
Start small rather than trying to implement everything at once. If you're currently running meetings with no interactive elements, begin by adding just one tool to your next session. Try using NameWheels for icebreakers at the start of your weekly team meeting for a month and see if participation improves. Once that feels comfortable, layer in a second tool like Zoom polls for mid-meeting pulse checks. Build your engagement toolkit gradually, paying attention to what actually changes participation and what feels like gimmicks.
The most important shift isn't adopting new tools—it's changing your mindset from "delivering information" to "facilitating interaction." Even the best spinner, whiteboard, or polling platform can't save a meeting where the agenda is unclear, the facilitation is weak, or the psychological safety is low. Use these tools as enablers of good meeting design, not as substitutes for it.
Start Making Your Meetings More Engaging
Try adding a random icebreaker to your next remote meeting. It takes 60 seconds to set up and can transform how your team starts calls together.
Create an Icebreaker Wheel